What fragrance terms do you find confusing? About which perfume concepts would you have liked to learn more?
Amber, musk, petally, floralcy, butyric, crisp.... Fragrance professionals struggle with the language, with which to describe perfume, and it does not help matters that the information available to the consumers is often extremely confusing. Among the perfume adjectives that I have always found confusing (and still do) is soapy, which can mean lots of different things to different people.
I've noticed that clean for me can have a variety of interpretations, in my mind at that. Not only with what other people meant.
Posted by: Ines | September 27, 2011 at 06:50
I'd say “creamy,” as in “creamy sandalwood,” that I read recently. Probably simply because I haven't smelled enough sandalwood to perceive the difference!
Also, “cold” scents. I think I understand, by opposition to what I'd consider a “warm” scent, but it seems a very arbitrary term in certain cases...
Posted by: Alnysie | September 27, 2011 at 06:55
I would like to find a term to describe those "new" musks, such as the musk used in the new No. 19 Poudre. This transcends mere "clean" (which might imply soapy or at least freshly scrubbed) and is the most synthetic-smelling musk yet.
"Powdery" is one I have an issue with. I dislike the type of powdery that smells like Teint de Neige, and yet I have no problem with No. 5. The word "powdery" can turn me off even trying a fragrance.
Posted by: Suzanna | September 27, 2011 at 08:10
Powdery has always been confusing to me. Suzanna mentioned No.5. Is it the resemblance to the scent of Johnson's baby powder? If so what is the scent in Johnson's baby powder?
Posted by: MJ | September 27, 2011 at 08:47
It's all so subjective, no wonder there are struggles with the language. Of course general terms like amber and tea and rose do mean something specific. Someone will make a dictionary of these terms eventually, so we can all refer and agree on what crisp and soapy mean.
Posted by: Lucy | September 27, 2011 at 08:59
I'm still wondering about "sparkling".
Posted by: katrin | September 27, 2011 at 09:21
As Lucy says, these terms are entirely subjective - both in our understanding of them and in their application. One thing that I've found difficult is that men's perception of odour is often different to women's, so we don't actually smell the same thing, no matter what name is given to it.
"Powdery", to me, is a dry scent, but one that doesn't grab you by the back of the throat like the smell of bleach. Many flowers, particularly wild flowers (ivy, ceanothus, for instance) have a powdery smell that is nothing like what I'd class as "floral". Even rose (rosa rugosa) is close to powdery when compared to, say, lily-of-the-valley (which is definitely floral).
Posted by: Martyn | September 27, 2011 at 09:32
Clean how I was taught is the absence of any animalic notes, save for white musks (which are not really animalic anyway.) But yes, it is often confusing anyway.
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 09:47
"Creamy sandalwood" is something I use often. I mean by it the milky scent, as opposed pencil shavings (or hamster cage!) dryness that many woods (especially cedarwood) have. Plus, sandalwood actually contains molecules that smell like warm milk.
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 09:49
Many people say that Chanel No 5 is powdery because of aldehydes. I do not find it powdery either. Powdery is a very specific term among professional perfumers, and it means an accord of heliotropin, citrus and some herbs (like Johnson & Johnson baby powder, for instance.) Fragrances like Ombre Rose or Love's Baby Soft are quintessential powdery blends.
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 09:51
Yes, you are right. As I replied to Suzanna above, that would be the powdery standard! :)
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 09:52
After all, professionals have a language that they use to communicate among themselves. The trouble is that there is no education for the consumers at all.
As for crisp and soapy, those are my least favorite words, even though I do use the former time to time (I try not to!) My perfumery school mentor used to get irritated whenever I used soapy or white floral, because the former means nothing (it is not an adjective used among perfumers), while the latter is too vague (there are many white florals! which one do you mean?)
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 10:03
If I could have a shot at it, I would say that it means citrusy or tart fruity.
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 10:04
Very true, some woods are not even woody! Sandalwood is not really dry woody like cedarwood. Wormwood is really herbal, sweet, etc.
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 10:05
"creamy sandalwood"- indeed!
I used to think it was an oxymoron, part of the mysterious jargon of perfume bloggers.
I recently stumbled on a few sandalwood fragrances that had a kind of milky note (SL santal de myosore, and an Amouage sandalwood attar), so I just realise I do not know what real sandalwood smells like!
I suppose the usual references - bois des iles, CC10 and Tam Dao - are not of the "creamy sandalwood" variety...
Posted by: zazie | September 27, 2011 at 11:26
You are right, those fragrances are rich in cedarwood and other dry woods. Pure sandalwood smells like boiled milk and roses. It is not dry at all. In fact, some perfumers do not consider it a true woody note.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 11:30
I agree with soapy (this is a negative assessment to me, whereas many people like soapy notes). Creamy. White flowers. Pink flowers. Musk - this tells me nothing, as musk can now range from dirty and animalic all the way to laundry detergent-clean. Balsamic. Chypre, in relation to the new fragrances which identify themselves as such, but do not have the traditional chypre base.
Posted by: Patty | September 27, 2011 at 11:31
I think many people perceive aldehydes as sparkling, though I don't get that effect unless it's just the tiniest smidge of aldehydes. Most perfumes that are known for being aldehydic (Chanel No. 5 or 22 or Vega for example) smell smeary to me, like I'm smelling them through a soft-focus lens.
Posted by: Elisa | September 27, 2011 at 11:34
Agreed on balsamic. I don't know how it differs from amber.
Posted by: Elisa | September 27, 2011 at 11:36
very interesting thread...thank you!
Posted by: Nikki | September 27, 2011 at 11:40
Amber is really a composite term like wood, floral, spicy. Some ambers are balsamic (amber notes in SL Ambre Sultan,) others are dry and woody (Light Blue,) yet others are animalic and marine (ambergris family and some clary sage derivatives.).
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 11:41
You are welcome, Nikki! I'm enjoying reading it too.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 11:42
Chypre! It has become so vague that it can mean anything. To think that SJP Lovely is classified as a chypre...
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 11:43
So am I right in thinking that "balsamic" applies to the more resinous ambers (not woody ambers and ambergris)?
Posted by: Elisa | September 27, 2011 at 12:18
Apart from creamy sabdalwood, the other mysterious label is "clean musk".
I suppose it means musky notes where the animalic-red fruity facets have been removed.
Yet the definition is so broad, it is confusing and not very informative: I think of the clean musks of kai and beyond love, that smell soft and like warm skin, and then there the others...I suppose not many people smell them, but they are not just clean. They are centrifugation-cycle-laundry-machine loudly clean!!! Blah.
Posted by: zazie | September 27, 2011 at 12:21
Yes, that's right. Labdanum based ambers, as a rule. I will have a post about this group of fragrances this week.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 12:26
Thanks, very helpful! That's how I generally interpret "amber" unless otherwise specified, and it's the kind of amber I love. (Mmmm, labdanum.)
Posted by: Elisa | September 27, 2011 at 12:30
Me too! To me, labdanum smells like dark caramel, incense and old books. :)
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 13:01
Balsamic has always confused me. I keep thinking of salad dressing or balsam fir trees. But it applies to ambers like labdanum? Good to know.
Posted by: kjanicki | September 27, 2011 at 14:22
Yes, labdanum is a classical balsamic material, but to be more precise, balsamic is a composite term in itself. I was taught to use this word to describe materials with a heavy, sticky, sweet, unctuous scents. For instance, balsamic materials includes balsamic-almond materials like heliotropin, coumarin, hay. Balsamic-vanilla includes vanilla, vanilla synthetics. Balsamic cinnamic materials include peru balsam, tolu balsam, etc.
You are actually spot on about your balsamic vinegar and fir balsam references! The first one, for instance, has all of the traditional balsamic facets--sweetness, richness, darkness, and the strange dry-sticky feeling of many balsams. I have smelled a very old balsamic vinegar recently that smelled so resinous and rich, it could have made a great base note in an oriental perfume. :)
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 14:43
Most confusing terms? Definitely balsamic, as almost everything seems to be described as "balsamic". But I honestly have no idea what it means. Another term I find confusing is musk, since, as a previous commenter wrote, musks can range from laundry clean to rabid-animal dirty. Though I understand it, I feel the mention of Galbanum in the notes of a fragrance is misleading. Knowing real Galbanum, it tends more toward musky and leathery to me than leafy-fresh, and most fragrances listing Galbanum are more of a violet leaf green than vegetal green. Oh, and I find orange blossom to be a confusing note, because I find many "orange blossom" fragrances to smell like grape candy rather than rich, Indolic white flowers.
Posted by: Andy | September 27, 2011 at 14:56
"Soapy" is the one that gets me. I have wondered whether it might refer to some aspect of benzoin, or something else in the base notes. I think I know what benzoin smells like, but I'm not sure. Anyway, how many people really know what soap smells like these days? Unless you go out of your way to avoid it, soap is always scented.
Posted by: marika | September 27, 2011 at 15:45
Thank you for mentioning white florals! I quite enjoy jasmine & orange blossom, which are white florals; on the other hand, I really dislike tuberose and gardenia. It's often impossible to know exactly what flowers are being discussed.
Posted by: rosarita | September 27, 2011 at 16:04
I have found indolic jasmine will often turn soapy on me. Not always, it could have something to do with the weather, but when it does happen, I suddenly feel like I have a bar of Ivory Soap in my mouth!
Posted by: Kym | September 27, 2011 at 16:32
Maybe, in the way "powdery" refers specifically to Johnson's Baby Powder, "soapy" refers to Ivory soap?
Posted by: Marika | September 27, 2011 at 18:29
Yes, that is why he did not like me using "white floral". It made no sense what I was talking about, considering that they are quite different.
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 18:40
Most musks today are clean, laundry type musks. Makes for a predictable finish to most fragrances today.
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 18:41
Galbanum is like hot pepper in perfumery--you only use a tiny bit to give green notes that bright effect. In strong dilutions, galbanum tends to be green and leafy. Otherwise, it is as you say, leathery, balsamic, dense.
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 18:43
Sometimes it does! Ivory is scented with citronella, so for many people those notes (rose-like, sharp citrusy) recall soap. On the other hand, if you were born in Europe, you are much more likely to associate soap with aldehydes. For instance, most soap from my childhood was scented with Chanel No 5 type of fragrance (floral aldehydic.) And to someone who grew up in India, soap smells different still. Which is why it is a very vague adjective.
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 18:45
I'm so glad you mentioned those fragrances, because I'm on the hunt for creamy sandalwood. I've been a little afraid of the SL, and curious about the Amouage.
Posted by: Annunziata | September 27, 2011 at 18:46
Benzoin smells like smoky vanilla and cinnamon. It can be more powdery or leathery, depending on the pairings, in which it is used.
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 18:47
Also, Serge Lutens Santal Blanc is creamy (although I like Santal de Mysore much better; Santal Blanc can get cloying.)
Posted by: Victoria | September 27, 2011 at 18:49
In both cookery and perfumery, "aromatic" bothers me. It's too general, or else I don't understand the meaning. Please explain aromatic! For example, what's the opposite? Scentless?
Posted by: Carla | September 27, 2011 at 23:29
I'm with kjanicki on balsamic. :) Can't help but think of vinegar (as I tend to use that variety a lot).
Posted by: Ines | September 28, 2011 at 03:45
Ah, it has a very precise meaning. In perfumery, aromatic means green, herbal, camphorous notes associated with herbs like lavender, rosemary, sage, etc. So, when you see aromatic (as in "an aromatic top note" or "aromatic fougere",) you can be sure that these camphor rich herbs are discussed.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Posted by: Victoria | September 28, 2011 at 06:43
Thank you, this makes sense to me
Posted by: Carla | September 28, 2011 at 10:04
Thanks for your reply -- I believe, in the spirit of thorough investigation, I will have to try them both.
Posted by: Annunziata | September 28, 2011 at 10:15
I wish "musk" would be strictly reserved for notes that actually smell something like the real thing - how can a term like "laundry musk" be anything but an oxymoron? When I see musk listed as a note, how do I know what kind it is unless they get cute with terms such as "crystal musk" in which case it's obviously the "clean" sort?
Posted by: Flora | September 28, 2011 at 16:29
In my own jargon, "powdery" would be Teint de Neige, obviously, or Love Chloe. While the aldehides give a "soapy" impression, like in Chanel 5 or Caleche and it's something completely different. Powder and soap are not the same. Maybe I find aldehides soapy because I have the influence of the Spanish showergel Magno.
Posted by: Isa | September 29, 2011 at 12:21
Sorry, I meant "aldehydes".
Posted by: Isa | September 29, 2011 at 12:24
I was wondering if anyone can tell me what a "round fragrance" means.
Thank you.
Posted by: Nora | January 08, 2012 at 04:23
It means a smooth, soft fragrance, with nothing sharp or rough.
Posted by: Victoria | January 08, 2012 at 09:49