Star rating: 5 stars--outstanding/potential classic, 4 stars--very good, 3 stars--adequate, 2 stars--disappointing, 1 star--poor.
Usually I steer clear of any fragrance named "Candy," given my unfortunate experiences with Aquolina Pink Sugar and other high-calorie gourmands. However, Prada Candy had a few things going for it: I generally very much enjoy Prada’s aesthetic, and I love the refined work of Daniela Roche-Andrier, the perfumer responsible for many fragrances in the line. She tends to render her accords as luminous and sparkling, and this radiant quality permeates Prada Candy. Although it explores rich materials like caramel, vanilla and sweet resins, Candy lives up to its name by conveying a dainty, luscious confection.
The idea of a rich gourmand composition presented as an elegant sweetmeat is much more difficult to execute than it might seem. Oriental resins like benzoin and tolu balsam that have an enveloping sweet darkness are also heavy and dense. Layered with vanilla, musk, tonka bean and other classical gourmand notes, the effect can be both cloying and rough. The main reason that Candy captured my heart from the first inhale is that it eschews all of the above. From the caramelized top notes with their illusion of pineapple and mandarin to the woody vanilla drydown, it retains an appealing brightness. Its sweetness is obvious, but never tiring; the aura of Candy overall is coquettish and playful, with a distinctly elegant character.
After the shimmering prelude, Candy becomes warm and velvety. The musk and vanilla lend it a delicious softness, while benzoin and amber fill the drydown with their smoky darkness. The accent is on the dry woods, rather than the buttery caramel (in contrast to the aforementioned Pink Sugar, which I find overly sweet and creamy,) a facet that makes Candy quite a sophisticated gourmand fragrance. The closest references for me would be Comme des Garçons Burnt Sugar and Serge Lutens Un Bois Vanille, though Candy is more of a radiant, abstract dessert than those perfumes. The abstract gourmand quality means that it does much more than simply indulging one’s sweet tooth; its luscious warmth is also irresistibly sensual.
Prada Candy includes notes of musk, benzoin, and caramel. It is available from Prada boutiques and select department stores (Neiman Marcus, Bergdorf Goodman, Barneys New York.) 1.7 oz of Eau de Parfum, $80; 2.7 oz, $108
Sample: my own acquisition
I smelled this briefly in NY and my thoughts were" it seems to have the elegance of infusion de iris and is reminiscent of it...but a whole lot sweeter" wish I could have a chance to smell it again after reading your review...and to experience the drydown
Posted by: hongkongmom | September 13, 2011 at 09:44
I am waiting for my bottle to arrive.
This fragrance is very well done. Just carefree and fun enough to appeal to a younger audience, but sophisticated enough, because of the benzoin, to appeal to old folks like me! I think it will have a broad appeal to women of all ages.
Have you smelled the new Diane von Furstenberg, Diane, yet, V?
Hugs!
Posted by: violetnoir | September 13, 2011 at 13:13
I find that its character is similar to Infusion d'Iris in its elegance. And the drydown is so warm and sensual.
Posted by: Victoria | September 13, 2011 at 13:34
Oh, not yet, but I am sure that it will cross my path soon enough when I go for my usual store check. For now, I am enjoying Annick Goutal Mon Parfum Cherie and Candy.
Posted by: Victoria | September 13, 2011 at 13:35
Yep, I am waiting to smell the new AG, too! :)
Posted by: violetnoir | September 13, 2011 at 13:44
Bought, returned after having a sample in the Neiman's Beauty Event gift bag. Nice, nothing more. Not complex. And I love Vanilla. Any Vanilla. Too 'department store' for this 'snob' I guess. Or simply, just not enough complexity. I prefer the latter.
Posted by: Judith | September 13, 2011 at 13:53
Of course, the phrase "your mileage may vary" applies really well to perfumes! :)
Posted by: Victoria | September 13, 2011 at 14:08
That one is my favorite fall launch so far!
Posted by: Victoria | September 13, 2011 at 14:08
Victoria, so many people compared Candy to Un Bois Vanille that I was very disappointed when it turned out to be quite different. I will try harder to judge it on its own merits. It is very, very light though.
Posted by: Ari | September 13, 2011 at 16:01
I will certainly try this, but will probably not buy it. Why wear candy as the weather cools when I can wear leather and woods?
Posted by: Carla | September 13, 2011 at 16:37
I sampled this today and was pleasantly surprised. I like it from top to drydown, it is sweet but not cloying and the drydown is very cozy. It is elegant as you say, and I will try again in late autumn/winter when this should be at its best.
Posted by: sunsetsong | September 13, 2011 at 17:00
Hope it comes to Hong Kong soon :-)
Posted by: hongkongmom | September 14, 2011 at 02:44
Squee...smelled this today, but I have to go back and test it on the skin. Didn't form opinions, as I had read your review first. Can't wait!
Posted by: hongkongmom | September 14, 2011 at 02:47
I loved this perfume and bought a FB and the lotion. I agree that it has the strong vanilla of Un Bois Vanille, but I smell more like a Bon-Bon with Candy rather than a cookie (UBV)! It is exceptionally fun to wear.
Posted by: Pklagrange | September 14, 2011 at 10:25
This is my teenage daughter's first "grown-up" perfume. She purchased it with her birthday money. I felt as though I was witnessing a milestone... And I am pleased she showed exquisite taste in her selection! I love the fragrance. I am more of a "floral" person, but it is a lovely scent, not at all "sugary", more buttery caramel and complex richness.
Posted by: Amarie | September 14, 2011 at 10:50
I bought 3 samples on e-bay. Although I like it, I am not crazy about it. It seems a little boring...
Posted by: Nikki | September 14, 2011 at 11:10
I purchased this unsniffed and I like it a lot. Just wish it lasted longer on me.
Posted by: dleep | September 14, 2011 at 12:08
I'm glad to hear it is not so sweet.
Posted by: civava | September 15, 2011 at 08:13
Do let me know what you think!
Posted by: Victoria | September 15, 2011 at 15:31
It is light, but I suppose that is why I like it. It also has a very interesting character.
Posted by: Victoria | September 15, 2011 at 15:31
I wear it all. :) Plus, our winters are long, so I know that I will have time to indulge in all sorts of perfume genres.
Posted by: Victoria | September 15, 2011 at 15:32
I agree, I found it too much in the August heat, but right now it feels much more appropriate.
Posted by: Victoria | September 15, 2011 at 15:32
That's a good distinction. UBV does smell like a cookie to me, and while I usually do not like such overly tasty perfumes, it is very interesting.
Posted by: Victoria | September 15, 2011 at 15:33
Sounds like a lovely choice for her first grown up perfume! :)
Posted by: Victoria | September 15, 2011 at 15:34
Money saved then! I am sure that this fall you will have more gourmands to explore. There should be some other new ones coming out.
Posted by: Victoria | September 15, 2011 at 15:36
I heard some other people complain about its lasting power, but I find it very tenacious. Not like Lutens or Tom Ford Amber Absolute, but still with enough presence.
Posted by: Victoria | September 15, 2011 at 15:36
I expected it to be much sweeter, but it is nicely balanced.
Posted by: Victoria | September 15, 2011 at 15:37
Do you find any similarities to Coromandel, my favorite benzoin scent?
Posted by: LuxuryObsessed | September 18, 2011 at 17:10
will do when i get there...
Posted by: hongkongmom | September 21, 2011 at 04:05
Bought this for my husband's Christmas gift to me after only trying a promotional mailing scent strip. Thank goodness, I adore it. I love Benzoin and Oriental/Gourmand, and this juice has phenomenal staying power on me. I just had to open the box to try it before Christmas to make sure it wasn't awful on me. Slept with my wrist under my nose and could still smell it the next night after a shower and scent-free day at work.
Posted by: Carol Melancon | December 17, 2011 at 19:01